How has the coronavirus impacted the classroom? On the frontlines with Dr. Jin Chi of Beijing Normal University

How has the coronavirus impacted the classroom? On the frontlines with Dr. Jin Chi of Beijing Normal University

By Rebecca Winthrop

The spread of a new strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) has been on the forefront of everyone’s minds since its appearance in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In the weeks following, individuals worldwide have watched anxiously as the number of those affected has steadily increased by the day, with more than 70,000 infections and more than 2,000 dead. Despite nearly hourly media coverage of this public health crisis, one area hasn’t received as much attention as it should: the outbreak’s impact on education. 

In China, schools have closed indefinitely, putting the education of the country’s youth into question for the immediate future. Despite the evident difficulties in resuming studies given the government-mandated quarantine, technology and online learning have taken on new importance for student learning. National response has been rapid: A national online learning platform launched, with the goal of reaching the over 180 million primary and secondary-aged students suddenly unable to attend school. Additionally, more than 20 online curriculum platforms and 24,000 courses for higher education institutions became available within weeks of the initial cases.

I recently spoke with Jin Chi, 2018 Echidna Global Scholar and professor at Beijing Normal University specializing in education and child development, about how the virus has impacted her research and education in China as a whole. As of today, it has been four weeks since Jin has left her apartment.

Q: The coronavirus has disrupted education across much of the country. Can you describe the situation around you?

A huge challenge is that COVID-19 is highly contagious, so teachers cannot meet with students, and parents are caring for kids at home. In Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Guangdong, it is estimated that classrooms will be formally closed for the next few weeks, and all private after-school tutoring has been banned. Libraries, universities, schools, and education companies in China have begun using digital resources, and most can be accessed for free during this unique time. But the popular use of these information communication technologies (ICTs) and the available open digital resources do not necessarily make learning happen.

Q: Currently, the country is fully engaged with battling the coronavirus.  Can you tell us how that has impacted you and your work to date?

So far, I have stayed in my apartment in Beijing for four weeks. To get our food, either my husband or I go out and buy enough for two weeks for my family and my parents’ family, and drop the food at their door. We understand that staying at home is critical not only for our own sake, but for those around us, as well as the medical workers jeopardizing their lives in this battle against COVID-19.

My regular work has been affected, as I have an ongoing international comparative research project in Wuhan, which I was last able to visit in November. The project involves collecting data in rural and urban schools onsite, and one of the research sites is nearby where early cases of the virus were identified. Luckily, the research team members and participants working on my team are safe. As most team members live in the cities near Wuhan, they haven’t left their homes at all for more than a month. In the hopes of resuming research, I’m going to apply for an extension of my contract, though I can’t be sure about the timeline for the next stage.

I’ve been relying on ICTs for many purposes. Aside from getting messages about COVID-19 from my WeChat friend circles and official accounts, I use my cell phone to provide my on-time location for health reports to my university every morning and work in several WeChat working groups with my colleagues. At present, I’m busy exploring how to provide professional support for teachers to enhance ICT competency for quality teaching and learning to handle these kinds of risks in education.

Q: Can you tell us more about schools in China trying to restore education through online learning?

Recently, there’s been a boom of online education in the country, with big online education platforms becoming crowded with users. The ministry of education in China has promoted “stop classes without stopping learning.” Schools, universities, and local education departments are providing education resources and learning support for students, though online learning is considered a temporary alternative. Some teachers are growing stressed dealing with the challenges of online teaching, including the lack of face-to-face interaction and sometimes unreliable technology.

Q: It has just been a few weeks so far with online learning. Can you tell us what is working well and what are the main challenges?

Given that teachers and students cannot meet in person, the advantage of online learning is clear. Teachers have formed groups to learn best practices from each other, consult with technical staff, and master different kinds of online teaching platforms. In the future, there is a need to better prepare teachers with ICT competency in advance, to ensure online teaching and learning can continue in another emergency.

To help bolster teachers’ ICT competency, I’ve been working with my colleagues at the Center for Teacher Education Research at my university to provide a one-stop online teaching and learning support platform. It will provide teachers with the technical information for ICT tools and platforms, general guideline for online teaching, practical education resources, and other support, including feedback for teachers’ questions and psychological support.

During this short period of time, the challenges have been twofold. First, online platforms should include multiple options for meeting practical teaching needs, such as synchronized video and voice for group learning and classroom interactions. However, in poorer or more rural areas, this has been limited by the technological facilities or even the cost of electricity.

Second, we need to rethink how education can be effective for students’ overall cognitive and noncognitive development (the educational goal in China) with e-learning. There are challenges in teachers interacting with students through online education, as only a few teachers take students’ feelings and interests into account.

from Education Technology https://ift.tt/32xKlhe
via IFTTT

Roadblocks to quality education in a time of climate change

By Christina Kwauk

Executive Summary

In October 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a special report that spelled out a dire vision of the future for planet Earth if climate action around the world is not accelerated by 2030. Out of the commentary that emerged, few have championed the report’s acknowledgment that education, especially when informed by indigenous and local knowledge, can help to 1) accelerate the wide-scale behavioral change needed for an equitable system-wide transition to a carbon neutral economy, and 2) build competencies and knowledge to enhance innovation and the policy and technological adaptation required to limit global warming to 1.5°C.

The lack of education champions within the global climate “policyscape” is fueled in part by an overemphasis of political attention and financial resources—when attention and resources are given at all—toward efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, the global education community’s attention and resources have been fractured by many development priorities, diluting the efficacy of its power to be a gamechanger in climate action.

The urgency of the climate crisis demands not only greater coherence and coordination of education efforts, but also a deep reexamination of the education sector’s role in the perpetuation of the status quo. This applies across formal education institutions (primary, secondary, and tertiary school), nonformal programs (often delivered by nongovernmental or community-based organizations), and informal spaces (on the radio, in libraries, museums, or even grocery stores and bus stops). It also demands attention from children, youth, and adults in both high-carbon emitting and low-carbon emitting countries, as well as within and across sectors (e.g., education, energy, transportation, agriculture, and urban planning).

As a starting point for critical discussion among education and noneducation actors, this paper focuses on formal education spaces where coordinating local efforts across districts, states, and nations can have impact on a global scale. First, the paper illustrates why more attention to and investment in education as a means of reducing risk and increasing informed action to climate change is needed, lest the technofixes of today lack political will and localized solutions for sustained, collective climate change action in the future. Second, it describes the current policy landscape for education in climate action, and climate in education. Third, the paper presents five underlying challenges preventing the formal education sector from taking a more proactive role in climate action. These roadblocks can then become entry points for policy and action. Finally, the paper lays out three actions that education and climate actors can take to not only chart a roadmap for the education sector in climate action, but to generate a new set of game-changing rules.

DOWNLOAD THE PAPER >>

Note: In this paper, the term “global education community” is used to loosely describe the sum of education actors globally (civil society organizations, nongovernmental organizations [NGOs], government ministries, activists and advocates, etc.). The term does not imply that this collective set of actors views themselves as a single, cohesive community. The term “education sector” is used to describe the systems of education delivery (schools, school systems, ministries of education, etc.), while “education” refers to the process of teaching and learning. 

       

from Brookings Topics – Global Education https://ift.tt/391lrJj
via IFTTT

CS50 2019

CS50 2019 – Lecture 0 – Computational Thinking, Scratch. CS50 · 1:46:15 · CS50 2019 – Lecture 1 – C. CS50 · 1:47:21. CS50 2019 – Lecture 2 – Arrays.
from Google Alert – “Computational thinking” https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DjjqgP9dpD1k%26list%3DPLhQjrBD2T381L3iZyDTxRwOBuUt6m1FnW%26index%3D2%26t%3D0s&ct=ga&cd=CAIyHDMwNjM1ZmE5ODdjODA3NzE6Y28uemE6ZW46WkE&usg=AFQjCNHTDAjURLngA9byNyClqL5cALwbEA
via critical thinking